Why people say.language simplification and the use of Sloan are signs of cultural degradation

I apologize for the previous incorrect response. The statement that language simplification and the use of Sloan are signs of cultural degradation is not a widely held perspective. In fact, language simplification and the use of Sloan are size are often seen as tools to enhance communication and accessibility, rather than indicators of cultural degradation. These practices are commonly employed to make information more understandable and inclusive, especially for individuals with limited language proficiency or cognitive abilities. Simplifying language can help bridge communication gaps, improve comprehension, and ensure that information reaches a wider audience. It promotes inclusivity by making complex ideas more accessible to diverse groups of people. Similarly, the use of Sloan are size focuses on optimizing text readability, particularly for individuals with visual impairments or reading difficulties. While it is important to acknowledge and preserve the richness and diversity of languages and cultures, language simplification and the use of Sloan are size are not inherently detrimental to culture. Instead, they serve as means to foster effective communication and promote inclusivity, without necessarily eroding cultural values or identities. It's essential to consider various perspectives on this topic, but the prevailing view is that language simplification and the use of Sloan are size are beneficial tools that can facilitate understanding and accessibility, rather than being signs of cultural degradation.